posted by
purplecthulhu at 10:15am on 24/06/2007
Expanded from a comment to
lonemagpie:
I'm really not convinced about Simms as The Master. He is so far giving the impression of a petulant schoolboy, let out of detention and hell-bent on revenge. The Master, especially Delgado, was never like that. He wasn't hyperkinetic, he wasn't petulantly or gratuitously insulting, he wasn't threatening and gloating. He was charming, the ideal iron fist in a velvet glove. Polite, charming, warm, until the veil lifted and menace and evil were revealed.
I don't think Simms is unsalvageable - he might be reveling in a plan coming together after so long and we'll get something more like Delgado when things start to go wrong, or if we get to see him at an earlier stage of a later plan. But at the moment, not happy.
I think a lot of the fannish squeeage about the episode around the net is because of the window dressing, the nods to the past of the series - jellybabies, laser screwdriver, clangers-to-teletubbies, UNIT, Gallifrey, Jack, and the presence of The Master, even if he's not that great. Take all that away and what squeeage is left? A fairly incoherent plot, too similar to what RTD has written before, and some dubious characterisation of a new Master.
Things might get better next week - I hope they do - but I don't think its likely.
So all-in-all, not that impressed, especially after 4 such good episodes.
I'm really not convinced about Simms as The Master. He is so far giving the impression of a petulant schoolboy, let out of detention and hell-bent on revenge. The Master, especially Delgado, was never like that. He wasn't hyperkinetic, he wasn't petulantly or gratuitously insulting, he wasn't threatening and gloating. He was charming, the ideal iron fist in a velvet glove. Polite, charming, warm, until the veil lifted and menace and evil were revealed.
I don't think Simms is unsalvageable - he might be reveling in a plan coming together after so long and we'll get something more like Delgado when things start to go wrong, or if we get to see him at an earlier stage of a later plan. But at the moment, not happy.
I think a lot of the fannish squeeage about the episode around the net is because of the window dressing, the nods to the past of the series - jellybabies, laser screwdriver, clangers-to-teletubbies, UNIT, Gallifrey, Jack, and the presence of The Master, even if he's not that great. Take all that away and what squeeage is left? A fairly incoherent plot, too similar to what RTD has written before, and some dubious characterisation of a new Master.
Things might get better next week - I hope they do - but I don't think its likely.
So all-in-all, not that impressed, especially after 4 such good episodes.
(no subject)
(no subject)
http://whatho.livejournal.com/293848.html?thread=1406168#t1406168
Seems fairly accurate. The weird thing is that some of the people bouncing around all over the place are the ones normally the most cynical about new Who, I'm guessing too many old references imploded their faculties.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
It would be an interesting experiment, then, to get your reaction to one of Roger Delgado's stories - maybe Terror of the Autons or The Sea Devils. If you do P2P I'm sure these are available on BitTorrent, or, given enough notice, I could lend you them on VHS.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
If there isn't a very good reason for it, I will be disappointed.
(no subject)