purplecthulhu: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] purplecthulhu at 09:15am on 25/06/2007
Seems that the FBI wants to head back to the days of academic blacklists.

According to a report. 'Faculty, staff and students are encouraged to monitor their colleagues for signs of suspicious behaviour and report any concerns to the FBI or the military.'

And what do they classify as suspicious behaviour?

'Unexplained affluence, failing to report overseas travel, showing unusual interest in information outside the job scope, keeping unusual work hours, unreported contacts with foreign nationals, unreported contact with foreign government, military, or intelligence officials, attempting to gain new accesses without the need to know, and unexplained absences are all considered potential espionage indicators.'

So no getting a second job, no friends abroad, no broad-minded interest outside your subject (there goes interdisciplinary research), in fact no curiosity at all!

There are often complaints about universities being academic sausage factories where narrow-minded speciality is encouraged. This complaint is often leveled at places like MIT, in the US, or Imperial, in the UK, which specialise in science and technology. It would seem this is exactly what the FBI and military think that universities are for.

How long before this kind of thing comes to the UK? Not long, I suspect...
Mood:: 'angry' angry
There are 11 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] swisstone.livejournal.com at 08:45am on 25/06/2007
keeping unusual work hours

That would be going home at 5, then ...
 
posted by [identity profile] purplecthulhu.livejournal.com at 09:53am on 25/06/2007
Different fields have different norms, and none of them are understood by admin. Of course its admin who would get the policing job if the Home Office decides to similarly snoop in the UK.
 
posted by [identity profile] makyo.livejournal.com at 09:21am on 25/06/2007
I thought they were already talking about that sort of thing, but the academics told them to get stuffed.
 
posted by [identity profile] purplecthulhu.livejournal.com at 09:29am on 25/06/2007
Specifically in the context of islamic extremism, yes, and I'm fully behind the academics telling them to get stuffed.

However, the sweep the FBI is aiming for goes much further and is the kind of thing that could be done by administrators who are rather less bolshey than the academics. We could, for example, be required to list all foreign travel, whether for work or pleasure.

The FBI proposal also extends to staff, while the Home Office has so far stuck to students. This opens the door for all sorts of petty academic rivalries to reach government ears under various pretexts. This is exactly what happened under McCarthy and is what blighted many careers - Robert Oppenheimer being one. Something like that in the UK would be just as disastrous.
 
posted by [identity profile] secretlondon.livejournal.com at 11:36am on 25/06/2007
The stuff on islamic extremism is trying to tell universities what they are allowed to teach. It's also *much* easier to blame the academics for the rise in radicalism for a certain % of the population than it is to blame the other more obvious social issues such as poverty, unemployment, Iraq..
 
posted by [identity profile] secretlondon.livejournal.com at 11:33am on 25/06/2007
Pretty much *everyone* online has friends abroad..

"showing unusual interest in information outside the job scope" - so you are not allowed to be interested in other stuff?

"keeping unusual work hours" and "and unexplained absences" are standard issues for people with mental health problems, or "eccentrics" in general.

This seems to see academia as a boring 9-5 job where you are judged on your comformity rather than your ability?
 
posted by [identity profile] purplecthulhu.livejournal.com at 11:49am on 25/06/2007
Quite...

But then conformity and control is what the agenda really is about.
 
posted by [identity profile] secretlondon.livejournal.com at 11:49am on 25/06/2007
Reading the actual pdf document it only seems to be concerned with people have access to classified information - presumably as a result of military/government funding. I presume this is science/engineering only.
 
posted by [identity profile] purplecthulhu.livejournal.com at 11:59am on 25/06/2007
Re classified information, apparently not:

'What we're most concerned about are those things that are not classified being developed by MIT... [and elsewhere]'

I'm not sure what outside science and engineering would be of interest to these hypothetical spies, but I'm sure some fairy tales could be made up to extend this to the whole of every university in the US. After all that non-WASP english professor from $FOREIGN found hanging around the physics labs could as easily be a spy as a science fiction writer.
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
posted by [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com at 12:23pm on 25/06/2007
How would you know if this had been introduced on the quiet?
 
posted by [identity profile] purplecthulhu.livejournal.com at 12:45pm on 25/06/2007
Interesting question...

Increased monitoring of where we were and when would be part of it, and I've seen no evidence of that so far (the swipe card system we have for entry is wholly inadequate for this task).

December

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18 19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31