posted by
purplecthulhu at 11:20pm on 02/04/2004
As far as I can tell, it seems that our glorious leader has been making up policy on the fly at press conferences, and now wants to push ahead with ID cards. Even if you agree with these in principle, there are a lot of problems with both this way of making policy and with actually implementing the system.
And, of course, as David Blunkett has admitted, ID cards will do nothing to fight terrorism, which is the current reason why Blair likes them.
A couple of sites for those who want to read more:
http://www.stand.org.uk who have a good long list of open questions on implementation
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/36748.html who have a rather cogent reporting and some suggestions about how this issue should be objectively investigated. Not that the current government of the UK actuially cares about 'evidence based policies', as they claim at election time.
And, of course, as David Blunkett has admitted, ID cards will do nothing to fight terrorism, which is the current reason why Blair likes them.
A couple of sites for those who want to read more:
http://www.stand.org.uk who have a good long list of open questions on implementation
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/36748.html who have a rather cogent reporting and some suggestions about how this issue should be objectively investigated. Not that the current government of the UK actuially cares about 'evidence based policies', as they claim at election time.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Different, compartmentalised ID methods, as we have at the moment, are in fact a benefit to security, and the minimal extra inconvenience this provides is a small price to pay for this security, IMHO.