posted by
purplecthulhu at 08:54pm on 29/05/2007
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
There seems to be a disagreement between Lord Rees and Dawkins et al. on how science should deal with religion:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,2089946,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,,2089946,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
It also has to be said that you would expect people in the biological sciences to be a lot more wary - the churches are on the whole more likely nowadays to be against biological theories and research areas (stem cell research, for instance) than against anything in theoretical physics or chemistry. Dawkins, in particular, is a feminist and a supporter of gay rights... which probably makes him even more wary.